Primary job
- FeatureJet
- Customer-facing feedback loop
- Linear
- Internal product development and execution
FeatureJet vs. Linear
Linear runs the work. FeatureJet runs the customer-facing loop. Choose the focused surface your users can see, or use it alongside Linear when your team already manages execution there.
The short answer
Choose FeatureJet
When customers need a public place to suggest, vote, follow, and hear back.
Choose Linear
When your team needs a deep internal system for planning, issues, projects, releases, and engineering work.
Honest positioning
Linear has evolved well beyond issue tracking. Its Customer Requests product connects feedback and customer context to internal issues and projects. FeatureJet stays deliberately focused on what customers touch and what small teams need to communicate in public.
Customer Requests can attach feedback to issues and projects, create customer records, use revenue or tier attributes, and accept requests through supported integrations.
Customers can submit ideas, verify their email, vote, comment, watch statuses, browse a roadmap, and receive the shipped answer without joining your internal workspace.
Keep product execution in Linear and use FeatureJet for the public board and communication loop. Today, that handoff is manual or built with the available APIs rather than a native sync.
At a glance
Last reviewed July 11, 2026. Linear facts below come from its current first-party pricing and Customer Requests documentation.
Sources: Linear pricing, Customer Requests documentation, Linear Asks documentation, and Releases documentation. Verify current terms before purchasing.
Choose by job
The strongest decision is not a feature-count contest. It is whether your missing system faces inward toward delivery or outward toward customer participation.
You are a founder or small SaaS team that wants a polished public feedback board, low-friction verified voting, a customer roadmap, a changelog, embeds, and automatic shipped follow-up at a flat price.
Your core need is internal product execution: issues, cycles, projects, timelines, releases, engineering integrations, customer records, and sophisticated workflows across a growing team.
Customers need a purpose-built public home while the team needs Linear's execution depth. Keep public promises and feedback in FeatureJet, then create or link the internal work in Linear using a lightweight team convention.
Questions, answered
Not for internal engineering execution. FeatureJet replaces or adds the customer-facing feedback layer: public requests, verified votes, a public roadmap, a public changelog, embeds, and voter follow-up.
Yes. Linear Customer Requests can link customer feedback and customer attributes to issues and projects. Its documentation says manual customer requests are available on currently offered plans, while some intake integrations require higher plans.
Yes. Use FeatureJet as the public feedback system and Linear as the internal execution system. FeatureJet does not currently advertise a native Linear sync, so teams should define a lightweight manual or API-assisted handoff.
FeatureJet is $15/month or $119/year for unlimited boards, posts, and voters. Explore the real public board first, then launch your own feedback loop.